headermask image


header image

Reconsidering Free Willy

A veteran SeaWorld trainer was leisurely rubbing Tilikum the killer whale from a poolside platform when the 12,000-pound creature shot up, grabbed her ponytail in its mouth and dragged her down underwater.

Horrified visitors who had stuck around after a noontime show watched the animal charge through the pool with the trainer in its jaws. Workers used nets and an alarm sounded, but it was too late. Dawn Brancheau had drowned. She was 40 years old.

It was the third time that the animal had been involved in a human death.

I guess that’s why they call it the killer whale.

Because of his size and the previous deaths, trainers were not supposed to get into the water with Tilikum, and just a dozen of the park’s 29 trainers worked with him.

Brancheau had more experience with the 30-year-old whale than most. She was actually one of the park’s most experienced trainers overall.

A SeaWorld spokesman said that Tilikum was one of three orcas blamed for killing a trainer in 1991 after the woman lost her balance and fell in the pool at Sealand of the Pacific near Victoria, British Columbia.

Tilikum was also involved in a 1999 incident, when the lifeless body of a man who had sneaked by SeaWorld security was found draped over him. The man either jumped, fell or was pulled into the frigid water and died of hypothermia, though he was also severely bruised and scratched by Tilikum.

So what to do with the murderous mammal? Sea Jail? Capital Punishment? Therapy?

Brancheau’s older sister, Diane Gross, said that the trainer would not want anything done to the whale because she loved the animals like children. The trainer was married but didn’t have children.

Billy Hurley, chief animal officer at the Georgia Aquarium, the world’s largest — said there are inherent dangers to working with orcas, just like driving race cars or piloting jets.

“In the case of a killer whale, if they want your attention or if they’re frustrated by something or if they’re confused by something, there’s only a few ways of handling that…If you’re right near pool’s edge and they decide they want a closer interaction during this, certainly they can grab you…At 12,000 pounds there’s not a lot of resisting you’re going to do.”

Wednesday’s attack was the second time in two months that an orca trainer was killed at a marine park. On Dec. 24, 29-year-old Alexis Martinez Hernandez fell from a whale and crushed his ribcage at Loro Parque on the Spanish island of Tenerife. Park officials said the whale, a 14-year-old named Keto, made an unusual move while the two were practicing a trick in which the whale was supposed to lift the trainer and leap up into the air.

spread the word...
  • Digg
  • Sphinn
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Mixx
  • Google Bookmarks
  • email
  • Print
  • Reddit
  • SphereIt
  • StumbleUpon
  • Technorati
  • Yahoo! Buzz

The Aspirin Question

Once they told you to take a daily aspirin for your heart, today you may want to reconsider.

Americans bought more than 44 million packages of low-dose aspirin marketed for heart protection in the year ending in September. The sales were up about 12% from 2005.

Well now, public-health officials are scaling back official recommendations for the painkiller to target patients at risk of a heart attack or stroke. The concern is that aspirin’s side effects, which may include bleeding ulcers, could outweigh the potential benefits when taken by healthy or old people.

Doctors generally agree that most patients who have already suffered a heart attack or stroke, the type caused by a clot or obstruction blocking an artery to the brain, should take regular low-dose aspirin. But for people without heart disease, the latest guidelines from the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force spell out much more clearly than before when exactly aspirin should be administered.

The guidelines, announced last year, suggest aspirin for certain men 45 to 79 years old with elevated heart-disease risk because of things like cholesterol levels and smoking. For women, the guidelines don’t focus on heart risk. The task force recommends certain women should take aspirin regularly if they are 55 to 79 and in danger of having an ischemic stroke, for reasons that could include high blood pressure and diabetes.

The panel wants doctors to factor in conditions that could increase a patient’s risk of bleeding from aspirin, which tends to rise with age. The group did not designate a dose, but suggested that an appropriate amount might be 75 milligrams a day, which is close to the 81mg contained in low-dose, or “baby,” aspirin. The task force however did not take a position on aspirin for people who are 80 and older because of a lack of data in this age group.

Aspirin acts as a blood thinner, believed to account for much of its benefit of protecting against heart attacks and strokes. But this action, along with a tendency to deplete the stomach’s protective lining, can lead to a danger of gastrointestinal bleeding and possibly bleeding in the brain.

Not all patients used to taking aspirin though, will want to stop. Maxine Fischer, 55 years old, recently figured out that under the new U.S. guidelines, she would not be encouraged to continue on with the drug. Using an online calculator, which factored such data as her age, blood pressure and medical history, she learned she had a 1% likelihood of a stroke in the coming 10 years. Under these guidelines, only women in her age group with at least a 3% or higher stroke risk should be taking aspirin.

Ms. Fischer, a manager for seniors’ lobby AARP in San Diego, has taken aspirin daily for two years after reading it could reduce the risk of stroke. For the moment, she says she’ll continue, partly because she’s more worried about strokes than ulcers. Strokes are

“the big scary thing.”

spread the word...
  • Digg
  • Sphinn
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Mixx
  • Google Bookmarks
  • email
  • Print
  • Reddit
  • SphereIt
  • StumbleUpon
  • Technorati
  • Yahoo! Buzz

Chris Paine and the Future of Electric Transport

Who Killed the Electric Car? is a 2006 documentary by Chris Paine which explores the creation, limited commercialization, and subsequent destruction of the battery electric vehicle in the United States, especially the General Motors EV1 of the 1990s.

It uses archive footage and interviews to build a case against various characters that surrounded the creation and destruction of the now iconic EV1 electric car. More specifically, the film looks at the roles of automobile manufacturers, the oil industry, the US government, the Californian government, batteries, hydrogen vehicles, and consumers in “killing” the electric car.

To travel beyond the scope of the movie, one question we might ask ourselves is this:

“Has the electric car seen a rebirth?”

Well, with startups like Tesla Motors and Fisker Automotive coming out with new models and old players like GM, Nissan, and Ford also working on their electric cars and series plug-in hybrids, is the future bright for electric transportation?

Me thinks NaturalBuy readers have gathered sufficient information to make enlightened and enlightening predictions…We hope!

spread the word...
  • Digg
  • Sphinn
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Mixx
  • Google Bookmarks
  • email
  • Print
  • Reddit
  • SphereIt
  • StumbleUpon
  • Technorati
  • Yahoo! Buzz

Global Warming = More Dangerous Yet Few Hurricanes

Top researchers are in agreement that the world is likely to see stronger in intensity yet fewer in frequency hurricanes in the future – and this is because of global warming.

Since right before Hurricane Katrina hit Louisiana and Mississippi in 2005, dueling scientists have sparred over whether global warming is worsening hurricanes. A new study splits the difference.

A special World Meteorological Organization panel of 10 experts in both hurricanes and climate change came up with a consensus which will be published online Sunday in the journal Nature Geoscience.

“We’ve really come a long way in the last two years about our knowledge of the hurricane and climate issue,”

said study co-author Chris Landsea, a top researcher for the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration.
The study gives projections for tropical cyclones worldwide by the end of the century:

Overall strength of storms as measured in wind speed would rise by 2 to 11%, but there would be between 6 and 34% fewer storms in number. Ultimately, there would be fewer weak and moderate storms and more of the big damaging ones – another projection of global warming. An 11% increase in wind speed translates to a 60% increase in damage.

spread the word...
  • Digg
  • Sphinn
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Mixx
  • Google Bookmarks
  • email
  • Print
  • Reddit
  • SphereIt
  • StumbleUpon
  • Technorati
  • Yahoo! Buzz

Being Green on Lent

In the Christian tradition of Lent, church-goers give up something like an everyday item for 40 days. It could be alcohol, TV, a certain food, something like that. But on Wednesday, the first day of this year’s Lent, many people chose to give carbon instead.

At the Grace Episcopal Church in Newington, Connecticut, church-goers were encouraged to analyze their light bulbs, their grocery bags, and their utility bills, and see where they could make changes. The name of the game is thinking

“about the environment and doing things to save it for yourself and those who come after us,”

quoth Reverend Jane White-Hassler.

It is only natural for a church that has been implementing eco-friendly building upgrades since last summer, and is currently even considering solar panels.

Also in Connecticut, Catholic priest and Franciscan friar Tom Washburn blogged on Tuesday about the carbon fast which he is undertaking, which he implemented initially in 2008. Let’s take a glance at his 40-day guidelines:

The 40-day plan lists simple energy-saving ideas which can lead towards a lighter carbon footprint, including snubbing plastic bags, giving the dishwasher a day off, insulating the hot-water tank and checking the home for drafts.

Here’s how it works:

First Day (Ash Wednesday): Take out one light bulb and live without it for the next 40 days.

Second Day: Check the house for draughts with a ribbon or feather. If there is flutter, buy a draught excluder.

Third Day: Tread lightly – on foot, by bike, on to a bus or on the gas as you drive. Make sure to find a way to reduce carbon dioxide emissions when you travel today.

spread the word...
  • Digg
  • Sphinn
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Mixx
  • Google Bookmarks
  • email
  • Print
  • Reddit
  • SphereIt
  • StumbleUpon
  • Technorati
  • Yahoo! Buzz

The Ups and Downs of Nuke-Powered Sleds

Did you know that sometime in this remaining lifetime of yours you might find yourself driving a nuclear-powered car? ‘Tis true, ’tis true. You also might be driving a solar-powered, wind-powered, landfill-gas powered, hydroelectric powered, ocean-energy powered, coal, oil or natural gas-powered car. ‘Tis true, ’tis true.

As it stands the US gets about 20% of its electricity from nuclear power and with President Obama’s new commitment for more uranium-fired power plants, we could see that percentage rise a few points. So, depending on what grid your electric car is recharging from, or what time of day it is, your car could very well be storing electricity generated at a nuclear plant. If this is the case, then you will have a nuclear-powered car.

This of course is assuming that someday you shall be driving an electrically-powered car, which is a likelihood that increases daily.

Financial help from Washington, using money on loan from taxpayers is helping to push along the drift toward electric driving. The requirement for automakers to meet new fuel economy standards is also helping the effort.

But government is not the sole force behind this electric drive effort: Small companies and startups are getting into the electric car business because they want to. Large companies too. Many of the majors are guaranteeing that electric cars and trucks are in their model portfolios of the future because they want them there.

Here are some reasons for the interest in electric cars…

1- Zero or largely reduced carbon emissions removes the cars as contributors to climate change.

2- Zero or largely reduced noxious emissions removes the cars as contributors to unhealthy air pollution.

3- Then of course there is the issue of oil supply. Manufacturers have seen the results – the widespread failure of their businesses – due partially to a spike in oil prices.

4- Leaps in technology, particularly in batteries. Lithium-based batteries with less weight and more stored power have improved range. Charging times have become reduced too. High voltage charging (440/480 volt for example) charging times could near that required to fill up a tank with gas. High voltage charging could also eliminate the need for battery swap-on-the fly schemes.

5- There is also battery life and afterlife. The lithium batteries are expected to last roughly the life of the vehicle. Also, when batteries can no longer hold enough charge to propel a car they can work in semiretirement storing electricity from renewable energy from the grid, like solar power.

6- Lastly, there appears to be enough demand in the marketplace. There are those people who want to charge from home, possibly with home-generated electricity. And there are people who want the relative simplicity of electric drive. And then there are the early-adopters who just want electric drive because it is new and different.

So if there is anything which is holding back the commercialization of electric cars it’s the cost of batteries that drive up the cost of the whole vehicle. Further, pure battery electric drive should not be expected to totally dominate the vehicle market for decades. The mix of vehicles on the road will range from conventional vehicles, any combination of hybrids, plug-in hybrids as well as variations of bio-fuel-powered vehicles for many years.

Me last thoughts are these:

President Obama’s yet-to-be-approved budget has $54 billion in federal loan guarantees for new nuclear reactors…you’ve probably heard this. ‘Tis true, the reactors will provide emission-free power, but nuclear power to charge electric cars is not necessarily the “green” way to go.

spread the word...
  • Digg
  • Sphinn
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Mixx
  • Google Bookmarks
  • email
  • Print
  • Reddit
  • SphereIt
  • StumbleUpon
  • Technorati
  • Yahoo! Buzz

Obama Gets Nukey

In its keenness to woo Republicans with nuclear-friendly policies, the Obama administration plans to hand out $54.5 billion in government-backed loans to jump-start a nuclear renaissance. On Tuesday, it announced the first beneficiary of this munificence—and apparently the best candidate it could find was a proposed plant that has been put on hold by federal regulators because of serious safety concerns.

The Department of Energy (DOE) will underwrite a loan of $8.3 billion to Southern Company’s two planned reactors at Plant Vogtle in Burke County, Georgia.

Last October, federal regulators discovered significant safety concerns in the design proposal for the Westinghouse AP1000 reactors that are scheduled to be used for the Georgia project and six others around the country. The Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) rejected the proposal after determining that the shield design would not protect the reactor from earthquakes, tornadoes, hurricanes, and airplane crashes.

Westinghouse says it will submit a new design this month. But it is unclear when the NRC would even review the do-over. The loan guarantee is conditional upon NRC approval.

But if the project ever takes off, there are multitudinous red flags signaling that it’s a very bad investment for the good taxpayers. The nuclear loan guarantees are intended to finance up to 80% of the total project cost for new reactors. Southern Company’s most recent estimate for the two reactors is $14 billion, though according to independent projections the real cost of a single reactor is probably closer to $12 billion. That means that the government could pour money into a new plant, only to see construction halt when the price tag rises and there are not sufficient funds to finish it.

Opponents of the loan guarantees cite Long Island’s now infamous case of Shoreham Nuclear Power Plant, which took 20 years and cost $6 billion to build, but was never put into commercial operation. Two decades after the troubled project was finally closed, ratepayers are still dishing out the funds.

spread the word...
  • Digg
  • Sphinn
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Mixx
  • Google Bookmarks
  • email
  • Print
  • Reddit
  • SphereIt
  • StumbleUpon
  • Technorati
  • Yahoo! Buzz

The Sierra Club Battles Alaska Senator on Energy

Democratic Arkansas Senator, Blanche Lincoln fell in line with Senator Lisa Murkowski, a Republican from Alaska late last month when she cosponsored legislation to block the EPA from regulating greenhouse gases under the Clean Air Act.

Lincoln explains her reasoning on her Web site:

Heavy-handed EPA regulation, as well as the current cap and trade bills in Congress, will cost us jobs and put us at an even greater competitive disadvantage to China, India and others. Arkansans, and the American public, want Congress to take a breath, slow down, and thoughtfully come up with energy policy that makes common sense and will help grow our economy.

Finding Lincoln’s use of the term “take a breath” to be ironic, activist groups such as the Sierra Club and MoveOn have decided to hit back against her efforts to derail greenhouse gas regulations.

Said the President of the Sierra Club of Arkansas, Carl Pope:

“Senator Lincoln’s constituents ought to ask her why she wants to help Big Oil and out-of-state coal companies to the detriment of the clean energy businesses and natural gas industry that are actually creating jobs in her home state.”

The Sierra Club of Arkansas released a 60-second radio spot in Little Rock and Fort Smith, urging residents to pressure Lincoln to support clean air and clean energy jobs in Arkansas.

Lincoln was unfazed by the Sierra Club’s campaign, as is seen in a statement released by her spokeswoman, Katie Laning Niebaum:

Senator Lincoln acted on behalf of Arkansas workers, employers and consumers to protect them from burdensome regulation. That’s why more than two dozen businesses and agricultural groups either based in Arkansas or with ties to the state supported Senator Lincoln’s efforts to prevent EPA’s overreach of regulatory powers.

Sierra Club Deputy Press Secretary Josh Dorner returned the fire:

From her response, it’s clear that–as we feared–she has chosen to side with the U.S. Chamber of Commerce, Big Oil, polluters, and other extreme right-wing, anti-science groups instead of the job-creating clean energy businesses and natural gas industry in her own state. It’s unfortunate that Senator Lincoln would put these special interests ahead of protecting the health and welfare of Arkansans and all Americans–and we hope she’ll reconsider.

spread the word...
  • Digg
  • Sphinn
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Mixx
  • Google Bookmarks
  • email
  • Print
  • Reddit
  • SphereIt
  • StumbleUpon
  • Technorati
  • Yahoo! Buzz

Donald Tries to Trump Gore, Meets Bill at the Gates of Truth

Donald Trump is in the green news today. The billionaire wants the Nobel Committee to strip former Vice President Al Gore of his Nobel Peace Prize.

Trump reportedly told a country club crowd of 500 that the recent snow storms on the east coast prove that Gore is wrong about global warming:

“With the coldest winter ever recorded, with snow setting record levels up and down the coast, the Nobel committee should take the Nobel Prize back from Al Gore…Gore wants us to clean up our factories… when China and other countries couldn’t care less… China, Japan and India are laughing at America’s stupidity.”

Donald Trump either did not mention or did not know about Vancouver’s unseasonably warm temperatures and lack of snow in his weather observations.
After last week’s record-breaking snowfall, scientists went to great lengths to explain that the storms do not disprove climate change. Some even believe that climate change actually contributed to the storms.

Last Friday, Bill Gates went after climate change deniers and explained that climate change and CO2 emissions pose a huge threat to people everywhere. Perhaps he and Trump should sit down and talk.

spread the word...
  • Digg
  • Sphinn
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Mixx
  • Google Bookmarks
  • email
  • Print
  • Reddit
  • SphereIt
  • StumbleUpon
  • Technorati
  • Yahoo! Buzz

Surfing Israel and Ankles Adorned with Love

I love this time of year. As the winter blues roll on-on the east coast, and I’ve squeezed all of the year’s respective joy out of the New England ski slopes; while others around me begin to get that icy depression and look like Jack Nicholson in Stanley Kubrick’s The Shining, I head off to a secret vacation spot.

In Israel, around this time of year, their winter draws to a close, leaving the desert climate moist and fresh from the rainy season. The beaches are not yet too crowded, so I, knowing this, take a suit case, my surfboard and head for Ben-Gurion airport in Tel Aviv.

This year my timing was perfect, I arrived one and a half weeks before the Purim holiday, right on the cusp of Israel’s springtime. At the beach, there is still a slight chill in the air, so I wear my long wetsuit; but there was a beautiful girl that I saw on the shore shouting to one of her friend’s, out a few yards in the Mediterranean; her wetsuit was one of those without pants legs. She didn’t seem to mind the hint of chill in the air. She had subtle freckles on her face, brought out by exposure to the sun, and her hair was like the color of the wet sand beneath her bare feet – and there around one of her feet I saw the coolest thing…

… It was an anklet. I did not want to be rude, but I needed to know where she got it and take a closer look,

“perhaps I can get one for my little sister,”

I thought. So I said

“Ma Nishma”

and introduced myself. Then I got down on my knees to take a closer look. What she had around her ankle had three amulets, a red “evil eye” from the Kabbalistic tradition, a Hamsa, and a little silver coin with an ancient style Hebrew inscription. I gave her a compliment and asked her where she got the hip anklet. She told me she got it shopping online at Hamsa Jewelry. I smiled and made a mental note: When I get back to my laptop at the hotel, I’m checking this Web store out!
Oh, and the surfing that day at Zvulun Beach was “sababa!”

spread the word...
  • Digg
  • Sphinn
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Mixx
  • Google Bookmarks
  • email
  • Print
  • Reddit
  • SphereIt
  • StumbleUpon
  • Technorati
  • Yahoo! Buzz